My Ph.D. is in Mathematics Education. Before that, I was mathematics department chair at the largest boys-only boarding school in South Africa. The school counts two Nobel Prize winners and Elon Musk among its alumni, so the standards are high, and the teachers work hard to keep them there. As chair, I kept asking one question: what can we do so our boys learn mathematics better and enjoy it more?
At the University of Georgia, that question led me to Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching, or MKT. The idea comes from Deborah Ball, Heather Hill and their colleagues at the University of Michigan. MKT is the body of knowledge a teacher or tutor needs in order to teach mathematics well, which is different from simply knowing mathematics. I saw pieces of it in my colleagues every day, and I wanted to study how it affects student learning.
This is a mouthful. How can any human being have all of this knowledge at once? The truth is that we all have some of it, and we can all grow in it. Teaching experience is what builds it, often in ways we do not notice until we look back.
The encouraging part is that the more MKT a teacher has, the more their students benefit. Hill, Rowan and Ball (2005) found that teachers' MKT predicted how much their students' math scores grew. Students gain in measurable ways because they meet mathematics in a rich, connected way. They often gain in another way too: they start to enjoy the subject, because someone taught it to them in a way that made sense.
Is it enough for a tutor to point to their own 1580? Unfortunately, no. A great SAT score, or Calculus III at a well-known university, shows strong common content knowledge. That is the first of the six parts. The other five take years of working with students to develop, and like most things worth having, they cannot be rushed.
This is not a criticism of young tutors. Many are bright and caring, and some grow into excellent teachers quickly. But parents should know what they are paying for.
Every question on freepracticesat.com is built on all six components of MKT. Each wrong answer choice is tied to the specific common mistake that produces it, so a student's results show more than a score. They show which misunderstandings are costing points. The explanations are designed the same way: they draw on knowledge of the curriculum, the mathematical horizon and the student, and on the most effective way to explain each idea.
Dr. Brink
More from the blog: the 5 math gaps that hold back SAT Math scores, and every skill the SAT Math section is built on.
See which mistakes are costing your child points. It takes one free practice test.
Take a free practice test About Dr. BrinkBall, D. L., Thames, M. H., and Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389-407.
Brink, D. J. (2007). Mathematical knowledge for teaching and collaborative coaching for secondary school professional development (Doctoral dissertation). University of Georgia. Available at UGA OpenScholar.
Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., and Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers' mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 371-406.